Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYRX vs TRIGX
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYRX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R3
Price$13.51
Change-$0.45 (-3.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.82B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$24.12
Change+$0.14 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.74B
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYRX vs. TRIGX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYRX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.7B vs. HFYRX (2.82B). HFYRX (1.86) and TRIGX (1.85) have matching dividends . HFYRX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYRX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYRX (1.47) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYRX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYRX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.76 vs. HFYRX (33.38). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 89.14 vs. HFYRX (68.33).
| HFYRX | TRIGX | HFYRX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.87 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.87 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.590 | 41.966 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.82B | 16.7B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.85 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.38 | 37.76 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.78 | 81.70 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.33 | 89.14 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 121.38 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers