Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYRX vs TRIGX
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYRX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R3
Price$14.64
Change+$1.39 (+10.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.11B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$25.75
Change+$2.94 (+12.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.14B
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYRX vs. TRIGX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYRX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. HFYRX (3.11B). TRIGX (2.47) and HFYRX (2.46) have matching dividends . HFYRX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYRX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYRX (1.47) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). HFYRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYRX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYRX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.40 vs. HFYRX (47.09). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 101.32 vs. HFYRX (74.27).
| HFYRX | TRIGX | HFYRX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.81 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.81 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.124 | 8.284 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.11B | 17.1B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.47 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.09 | 50.40 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.10 | 85.64 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.27 | 101.32 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 163.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers