Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYRX vs TRIGX
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYRX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R3
Price$12.90
Change+$0.06 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.51B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.38
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.18B
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYRX vs. TRIGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYRX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. HFYRX (2.51B). HFYRX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYRX (2.06) vs TRIGX (1.96). HFYRX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYRX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYRX (1.47) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYRX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYRX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). HFYRX (25.96) and TRIGX (24.97) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 100.87 vs. HFYRX (78.61).
| HFYRX | TRIGX | HFYRX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.87 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.87 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.088 | 31.725 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.51B | 16.2B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 1.96 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.96 | 24.97 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.02 | 89.53 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.61 | 100.87 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement