Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYRX vs TRIGX
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYRX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R3
Price$13.76
Change-$0.06 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.72B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$23.55
Change-$0.17 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.84B
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYRX vs. TRIGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYRX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. HFYRX (2.72B). HFYRX (1.90) and TRIGX (1.90) have matching dividends . HFYRX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYRX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYRX (1.47) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYRX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYRX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). HFYRX (38.85) and TRIGX (38.57) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 98.02 vs. HFYRX (81.84).
| HFYRX | TRIGX | HFYRX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.87 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.87 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.747 | 39.612 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 16.8B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 1.90 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.85 | 38.57 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.37 | 84.72 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.84 | 98.02 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 113.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers