Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYRX vs TRIGX
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYRX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R3
Price$12.33
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.39B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.75B
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYRX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYRX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. HFYRX (2.39B). HFYRX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYRX (2.17) vs TRIGX (2.04). HFYRX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYRX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYRX (1.47) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYRX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYRX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.12 vs. HFYRX (22.85). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.95 vs. HFYRX (76.35).
| HFYRX | TRIGX | HFYRX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.87 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.87 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.296 | 26.780 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 15.8B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.17 | 2.04 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.85 | 25.12 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.89 | 72.07 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.35 | 99.95 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement