Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYRX vs TRIGX
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYRX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R3
Price$12.57
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.92
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.98B
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYRX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYRX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. HFYRX (2.44B). HFYRX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYRX (2.17) vs TRIGX (2.04). HFYRX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYRX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYRX (1.47) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYRX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYRX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX (27.40) and HFYRX (26.85) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.97 vs. HFYRX (74.68).
| HFYRX | TRIGX | HFYRX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.87 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.87 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.735 | 29.017 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 16B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.17 | 2.04 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.85 | 27.40 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.41 | 76.27 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.68 | 99.97 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement