Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYFX vs TRIGX
HFYFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYFX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val F
Price$13.29
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.59B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.36B
HFYFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYFX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. HFYFX (2.59B). HFYFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYFX (2.46) vs TRIGX (1.91). HFYFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYFX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than HFYFX (0.76). HFYFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFYFX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFYFX (1000000). HFYFX (28.42) and TRIGX (27.26) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 108.71 vs. HFYFX (91.04).
| HFYFX | TRIGX | HFYFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.680 | 34.432 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 16.4B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 1.91 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.42 | 27.26 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.79 | 99.99 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.04 | 108.71 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 100.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers