Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYFX vs TRIGX
HFYFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYFX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val F
Price$13.81
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.89B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$23.80
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.74B
HFYFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYFX is a Hold and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.7B vs. HFYFX (2.89B). HFYFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYFX (2.38) vs TRIGX (1.85). HFYFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYFX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than HFYFX (0.76). HFYFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFYFX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFYFX (1000000). HFYFX (40.29) and TRIGX (39.59) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 87.51 vs. HFYFX (73.81).
| HFYFX | TRIGX | HFYFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.988 | 40.082 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.89B | 16.7B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 1.85 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.29 | 39.59 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.80 | 79.68 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.81 | 87.51 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 115.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers