Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYCX vs TRIGX
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYCX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val C
Price$12.31
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.39B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.75B
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYCX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. HFYCX (2.39B). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HFYCX: TRIGX (2.04) vs HFYCX (1.71). HFYCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYCX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYCX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.12 vs. HFYCX (22.39). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.95 vs. HFYCX (72.72).
| HFYCX | TRIGX | HFYCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.021 | 26.780 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 15.8B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 2.04 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.39 | 25.12 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.73 | 72.07 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.72 | 99.95 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement