Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYCX vs TRIGX
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYCX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val C
Price$12.05
Change-$0.14 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.32B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.92
Change-$0.28 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.05B
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYCX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. HFYCX (2.32B). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HFYCX: TRIGX (2.11) vs HFYCX (1.59). HFYCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYCX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYCX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.76 vs. HFYCX (20.81). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 96.83 vs. HFYCX (68.94).
| HFYCX | TRIGX | HFYCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.315 | 23.131 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 15B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 2.11 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.81 | 23.76 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.72 | 66.38 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.94 | 96.83 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers