Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYCX vs TRIGX
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYCX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val C
Price$13.73
Change-$0.07 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.72B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$23.55
Change-$0.17 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.84B
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYCX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. HFYCX (2.72B). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HFYCX: TRIGX (1.90) vs HFYCX (1.45). HFYCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYCX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYCX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX (38.57) and HFYCX (38.33) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 98.02 vs. HFYCX (78.07).
| HFYCX | TRIGX | HFYCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.267 | 39.612 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 16.8B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.90 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.33 | 38.57 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.19 | 84.72 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.07 | 98.02 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 113.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers