HFWA
Price
$24.97
Change
+$0.56 (+2.29%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:36 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
829.05M
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFBC
Price
$43.85
Change
+$0.06 (+0.14%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:38 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
104.57M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HFWA vs SFBC

Header iconHFWA vs SFBC Comparison
Open Charts HFWA vs SFBCBanner chart's image
Heritage Financial
Price$24.97
Change+$0.56 (+2.29%)
Volume$100
Capitalization829.05M
Sound Financial Ban
Price$43.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.14%)
Volume$378
Capitalization104.57M
HFWA vs SFBC Comparison Chart in %
HFWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HFWA vs. SFBC commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFWA is a Hold and SFBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (HFWA: $24.41 vs. SFBC: $43.79)
Brand notoriety: HFWA and SFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HFWA: 135% vs. SFBC: 177%
Market capitalization -- HFWA: $829.05M vs. SFBC: $104.57M
HFWA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $829.05M. SFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $104.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HFWA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HFWA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HFWA is a better buy in the long-term than SFBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HFWA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HFWA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HFWA is a better buy in the short-term than SFBC.

Price Growth

HFWA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.22% price change this week, while SFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

HFWA is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFWA($829M) has a higher market cap than SFBC($105M). SFBC has higher P/E ratio than HFWA: SFBC (16.52) vs HFWA (14.80). HFWA YTD gains are higher at: 3.214 vs. SFBC (0.367). SFBC has less debt than HFWA: SFBC (40.7M) vs HFWA (160M). HFWA has higher revenues than SFBC: HFWA (237M) vs SFBC (38.7M).
HFWASFBCHFWA / SFBC
Capitalization829M105M790%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.2140.367876%
P/E Ratio14.8016.5290%
Revenue237M38.7M612%
Total Cash90.8MN/A-
Total Debt160M40.7M393%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HFWA vs SFBC: Fundamental Ratings
HFWA
SFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6553
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7838
SMR RATING
1..100
3170
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5974
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8895
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HFWA's Valuation (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (66). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

SFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFWA (78). This means that SFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's SMR Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBC (70). This means that HFWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (74). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (95). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HFWASFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HFWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TROUF0.020.01
+64.86%
Troubadour Resources Inc.
NCBDY13.240.05
+0.38%
Bandai Namco Holdings, Inc.
AUOTY4.72N/A
N/A
AUO CORPORATION
FSBH15.80N/A
N/A
FSBH CORP.
DTLIF9.30-0.20
-2.11%
D2L INC.

HFWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFWA has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HFWA jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFWA
1D Price
Change %
HFWA100%
+2.35%
STBA - HFWA
87%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
CVBF - HFWA
86%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
HOPE - HFWA
86%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
BANR - HFWA
85%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
FCF - HFWA
85%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
More

SFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBC has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFBC jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBC
1D Price
Change %
SFBC100%
-0.09%
WNEB - SFBC
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
FBP - SFBC
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
GSBC - SFBC
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
BFIN - SFBC
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HFWA - SFBC
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
More