HFWA
Price
$25.37
Change
+$0.05 (+0.20%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
861.48M
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFBC
Price
$44.60
Change
-$0.02 (-0.04%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
106.51M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HFWA vs SFBC

Header iconHFWA vs SFBC Comparison
Open Charts HFWA vs SFBCBanner chart's image
Heritage Financial
Price$25.37
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
Volume$197.51K
Capitalization861.48M
Sound Financial Ban
Price$44.60
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
Volume$5.45K
Capitalization106.51M
HFWA vs SFBC Comparison Chart in %
HFWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HFWA vs. SFBC commentary
Dec 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFWA is a StrongBuy and SFBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 15, 2025
Stock price -- (HFWA: $25.32 vs. SFBC: $44.63)
Brand notoriety: HFWA and SFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HFWA: 109% vs. SFBC: 65%
Market capitalization -- HFWA: $861.48M vs. SFBC: $106.51M
HFWA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $861.48M. SFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $106.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HFWA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HFWA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HFWA is a better buy in the long-term than SFBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HFWA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HFWA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SFBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFBC is a better buy in the short-term than HFWA.

Price Growth

HFWA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.58% price change this week, while SFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

HFWA is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFWA($861M) has a higher market cap than SFBC($107M). SFBC has higher P/E ratio than HFWA: SFBC (16.83) vs HFWA (15.38). HFWA YTD gains are higher at: 7.674 vs. SFBC (-13.887). SFBC has less debt than HFWA: SFBC (40.7M) vs HFWA (160M). HFWA has higher revenues than SFBC: HFWA (237M) vs SFBC (38.7M).
HFWASFBCHFWA / SFBC
Capitalization861M107M805%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.674-13.887-55%
P/E Ratio15.3816.8391%
Revenue237M38.7M612%
Total Cash90.8MN/A-
Total Debt160M40.7M393%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HFWA vs SFBC: Fundamental Ratings
HFWA
SFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2312
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7532
SMR RATING
1..100
3371
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4874
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8794
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HFWA's Valuation (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (68). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

SFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFWA (75). This means that SFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's SMR Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBC (71). This means that HFWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (74). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (94). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HFWASFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HFWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIMAF58.740.08
+0.14%
Linamar Corporation
CKISF6.78N/A
N/A
CK Infrastructure Holdings Limited
MBGPF0.96N/A
N/A
MOBERG PHARMA AB
HKHC25.83-0.18
-0.67%
Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation
SRLY15.75-1.75
-10.00%
Southern Realty Co.

HFWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFWA has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HFWA jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFWA
1D Price
Change %
HFWA100%
+0.36%
STBA - HFWA
88%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
CVBF - HFWA
88%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
HOPE - HFWA
87%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
TCBK - HFWA
86%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
FCF - HFWA
86%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
More

SFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBC has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFBC jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBC
1D Price
Change %
SFBC100%
+0.51%
WNEB - SFBC
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
FFBC - SFBC
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
NIC - SFBC
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
FBP - SFBC
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
HFWA - SFBC
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More