HFWA
Price
$25.57
Change
+$1.16 (+4.75%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
829.05M
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MPB
Price
$32.42
Change
+$0.79 (+2.50%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
732.85M
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HFWA vs MPB

Header iconHFWA vs MPB Comparison
Open Charts HFWA vs MPBBanner chart's image
Heritage Financial
Price$25.57
Change+$1.16 (+4.75%)
Volume$5.63K
Capitalization829.05M
Mid Penn Ban
Price$32.42
Change+$0.79 (+2.50%)
Volume$2.81K
Capitalization732.85M
HFWA vs MPB Comparison Chart in %
HFWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MPB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HFWA vs. MPB commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFWA is a Hold and MPB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (HFWA: $24.41 vs. MPB: $31.63)
Brand notoriety: HFWA and MPB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HFWA: 135% vs. MPB: 141%
Market capitalization -- HFWA: $829.05M vs. MPB: $732.85M
HFWA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $829.05M. MPB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $732.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HFWA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMPB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HFWA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MPB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPB is a better buy in the long-term than HFWA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HFWA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HFWA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MPB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HFWA is a better buy in the short-term than MPB.

Price Growth

HFWA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.22% price change this week, while MPB (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

HFWA is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

MPB is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.83% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFWA($829M) has a higher market cap than MPB($733M). HFWA has higher P/E ratio than MPB: HFWA (14.80) vs MPB (13.07). HFWA YTD gains are higher at: 3.214 vs. MPB (1.966). HFWA has more cash in the bank: 90.8M vs. MPB (52.7M). MPB has less debt than HFWA: MPB (76.4M) vs HFWA (160M). HFWA has higher revenues than MPB: HFWA (237M) vs MPB (208M).
HFWAMPBHFWA / MPB
Capitalization829M733M113%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.2141.966163%
P/E Ratio14.8013.07113%
Revenue237M208M114%
Total Cash90.8M52.7M172%
Total Debt160M76.4M209%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HFWA vs MPB: Fundamental Ratings
HFWA
MPB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6560
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7854
SMR RATING
1..100
3135
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8822
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPB's Valuation (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (48). This means that MPB’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

MPB's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (78). This means that MPB’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's SMR Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MPB (35). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to MPB’s over the last 12 months.

MPB's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (59). This means that MPB’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

MPB's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for HFWA (88). This means that MPB’s stock grew significantly faster than HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HFWAMPB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HFWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MPB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHSCX50.980.45
+0.89%
BlackRock Health Sciences Opps Inv C
CSVAX24.130.09
+0.37%
Columbia International Div Inc A
VLNPX50.230.15
+0.30%
Voya Small Cap Growth R6
UUPSX79.240.08
+0.10%
ProFunds UltraEmerging Markets Svc
ARTHX23.57-0.05
-0.21%
Artisan Global Equity Investor

HFWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFWA has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HFWA jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFWA
1D Price
Change %
HFWA100%
+2.35%
STBA - HFWA
87%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
CVBF - HFWA
86%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
HOPE - HFWA
86%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
BANR - HFWA
85%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
FCF - HFWA
85%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
More

MPB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPB has been closely correlated with UVSP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPB jumps, then UVSP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPB
1D Price
Change %
MPB100%
+0.99%
UVSP - MPB
84%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
HFWA - MPB
78%
Closely correlated
+2.35%
EFSC - MPB
78%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
CVBF - MPB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
OSBC - MPB
78%
Closely correlated
+2.97%
More