Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFSSX vs TRIGX
HFSSX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFSSX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Cntrrn Val SDR
Price$15.58
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.17M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.75B
HFSSX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. HFSSX (123M). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HFSSX: TRIGX (2.04) vs HFSSX (1.50). HFSSX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFSSX (3 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFSSX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFSSX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFSSX (5000000). HFSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.83 vs. TRIGX (25.12).
| HFSSX | TRIGX | HFSSX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.87 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.667 | 26.780 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 123M | 15.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 2.04 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.83 | 25.12 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.40 | 72.07 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 99.95 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement