Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFSIX vs TRIGX
HFSIX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFSIX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Cntrrn Val I
Price$16.51
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.89M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.35B
HFSIX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. HFSIX (153M). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HFSIX: TRIGX (1.91) vs HFSIX (1.29). HFSIX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFSIX (3 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFSIX (1.56) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFSIX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.26 vs. HFSIX (23.79).
| HFSIX | TRIGX | HFSIX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.87 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.87 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.119 | 34.432 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153M | 16.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.91 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.79 | 27.26 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.66 | 99.99 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 108.71 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 100.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement