Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFSFX vs TRIGX
HFSFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFSFX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Cntrrn Val F
Price$17.17
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.14M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$23.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.74B
HFSFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.7B vs. HFSFX (163M). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HFSFX: TRIGX (1.85) vs HFSFX (1.36). HFSFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFSFX (2 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFSFX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFSFX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFSFX (1000000). TRIGX (39.95) and HFSFX (39.52) have marching annual gain over last year.
| HFSFX | TRIGX | HFSFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.87 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.593 | 39.788 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163M | 16.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.85 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.52 | 39.95 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 79.69 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 87.12 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 116.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers