Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQTX vs TRIGX
HFQTX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQTX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income T
Price$6.99
Change+$0.04 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.59B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.35B
HFQTX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQTX vs. TRIGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQTX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. HFQTX (6.59B). HFQTX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQTX (7.11) vs TRIGX (1.91). HFQTX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQTX (8 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFQTX (0.95) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFQTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQTX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.26 vs. HFQTX (18.53). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 108.71 vs. HFQTX (72.32).
| HFQTX | TRIGX | HFQTX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.87 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.87 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.245 | 34.432 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.59B | 16.3B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.11 | 1.91 | 372% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.53 | 27.26 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.24 | 99.99 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.32 | 108.71 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 100.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers