Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQTX vs TRIGX
HFQTX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQTX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income T
Price$7.00
Change+$0.02 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.38
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.18B
HFQTX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQTX vs. TRIGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQTX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. HFQTX (6.44B). HFQTX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQTX (7.06) vs TRIGX (1.96). HFQTX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQTX (8 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFQTX (0.95) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFQTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQTX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.97 vs. HFQTX (19.96). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 100.87 vs. HFQTX (69.88).
| HFQTX | TRIGX | HFQTX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.87 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.87 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.487 | 31.725 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.44B | 16.2B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.06 | 1.96 | 360% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.96 | 24.97 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.77 | 89.53 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.88 | 100.87 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement