Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQSX vs TRIGX
HFQSX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQSX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income S
Price$6.79
Change+$0.02 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.75B
HFQSX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQSX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQSX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. HFQSX (6.24B). HFQSX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQSX (7.08) vs TRIGX (2.04). HFQSX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQSX (8 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFQSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFQSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQSX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.12 vs. HFQSX (18.40). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.95 vs. HFQSX (68.25).
| HFQSX | TRIGX | HFQSX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.87 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.87 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.722 | 26.780 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 15.8B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.08 | 2.04 | 347% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.40 | 25.12 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.49 | 72.07 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.25 | 99.95 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement