Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQSX vs TRIGX
HFQSX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQSX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income S
Price$6.93
Change+$0.04 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.59B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.35B
HFQSX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQSX vs. TRIGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQSX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. HFQSX (6.59B). HFQSX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQSX (6.91) vs TRIGX (1.91). HFQSX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQSX (8 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFQSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFQSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQSX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.26 vs. HFQSX (16.47). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 108.71 vs. HFQSX (67.33).
| HFQSX | TRIGX | HFQSX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.87 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.87 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.224 | 34.432 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.59B | 16.3B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.91 | 1.91 | 361% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.47 | 27.26 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.49 | 99.99 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.33 | 108.71 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 100.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement