Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQRX vs TBCUX
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs TBCUX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.58
Change+$0.02 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.01B
Tweedy, Browne Intl Val II - Ccy UnH
Price$17.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.19M
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. TBCUX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Hold and TBCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 7.01B vs. TBCUX (164M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than TBCUX: HFQRX (6.97) vs TBCUX (2.34). HFQRX was incepted earlier than TBCUX: HFQRX (10 years) vs TBCUX (16 years). TBCUX (1.43) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. TBCUX (13.00). TBCUX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: TBCUX (2500) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.77 vs. TBCUX (24.40). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 64.84 vs. TBCUX (17.11).
| HFQRX | TBCUX | HFQRX / TBCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.42 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.43 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.552 | 3.595 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.01B | 164M | 4,273% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.97 | 2.34 | 299% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.77 | 24.40 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.09 | 11.02 | 482% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.84 | 17.11 | 379% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.98 | 64.26 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement