Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQRX vs TBCUX
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs TBCUX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.28
Change+$0.06 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
Tweedy, Browne Intl Val II - Ccy UnH
Price$17.37
Change+$0.10 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.88M
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. TBCUX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Buy and TBCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.7B vs. TBCUX (160M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than TBCUX: HFQRX (7.08) vs TBCUX (1.85). HFQRX was incepted earlier than TBCUX: HFQRX (10 years) vs TBCUX (16 years). TBCUX (1.43) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TBCUX (13.00). TBCUX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: TBCUX (2500) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.46 vs. TBCUX (3.72). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 62.13 vs. TBCUX (22.30).
| HFQRX | TBCUX | HFQRX / TBCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.42 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.43 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.450 | 23.735 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.7B | 160M | 4,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.08 | 1.85 | 382% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.46 | 3.72 | 631% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.75 | 16.23 | 282% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.13 | 22.30 | 279% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.44 | 49.86 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers