Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQIX vs TRIGX
HFQIX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQIX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income I
Price$7.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.59B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.36B
HFQIX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQIX vs. TRIGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQIX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. HFQIX (6.59B). HFQIX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQIX (7.19) vs TRIGX (1.91). HFQIX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQIX (17 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than HFQIX (0.79). HFQIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQIX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.26 vs. HFQIX (18.55). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 108.71 vs. HFQIX (73.37).
| HFQIX | TRIGX | HFQIX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.87 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.87 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.374 | 34.432 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.59B | 16.4B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.19 | 1.91 | 376% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.55 | 27.26 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.61 | 99.99 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.37 | 108.71 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.88 | 100.18 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers