Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQCX vs TRIGX
HFQCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQCX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income C
Price$6.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.59B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.35B
HFQCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQCX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. HFQCX (6.59B). HFQCX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQCX (6.42) vs TRIGX (1.91). HFQCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQCX (19 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFQCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQCX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.26 vs. HFQCX (17.51). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 108.71 vs. HFQCX (65.57).
| HFQCX | TRIGX | HFQCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.87 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.87 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.522 | 34.432 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.59B | 16.3B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.42 | 1.91 | 336% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.51 | 27.26 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.19 | 99.99 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.57 | 108.71 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.94 | 100.18 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement