Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQAX vs TRIGX
HFQAX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQAX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income A
Price$7.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.54
Change+$0.07 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.38B
HFQAX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQAX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQAX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. HFQAX (6.44B). HFQAX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQAX (7.02) vs TRIGX (2.05). HFQAX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQAX (19 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFQAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQAX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.74 vs. HFQAX (21.28). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.25 vs. HFQAX (64.92).
| HFQAX | TRIGX | HFQAX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.87 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.87 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.974 | 32.666 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.44B | 16.4B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.02 | 2.05 | 342% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.28 | 28.74 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.26 | 74.90 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.92 | 99.25 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.81 | 86.82 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers