Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFMDX vs SSGSX
HFMDX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HFMDX vs SSGSX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 I
Price$23.20
Change+$0.10 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
HFMDX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFMDX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFMDX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. HFMDX (1.34B). SSGSX pays higher dividends than HFMDX: SSGSX (0.47) vs HFMDX (0.16). HFMDX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HFMDX (22 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HFMDX (1.33) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HFMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). HFMDX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.56 vs. HFMDX (-3.99). HFMDX return over 5 years is better than : 85.47 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| HFMDX | SSGSX | HFMDX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.26 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.26 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.700 | 2.046 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 5.64B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.47 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.99 | -1.56 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.95 | 3.97 | 477% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.47 | 22.95 | 372% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.63 | 24.71 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement