Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFMDX vs SSGSX
HFMDX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HFMDX vs SSGSX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 I
Price$22.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
HFMDX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFMDX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFMDX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. HFMDX (1.32B). SSGSX pays higher dividends than HFMDX: SSGSX (0.50) vs HFMDX (0.17). HFMDX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HFMDX (22 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HFMDX (1.33) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HFMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). HFMDX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.53 vs. HFMDX (-10.08). HFMDX return over 5 years is better than : 78.23 vs. SSGSX (15.88).
| HFMDX | SSGSX | HFMDX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.26 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.26 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.398 | -2.025 | -20% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 5.5B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.50 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.08 | -5.53 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.03 | -9.76 | -72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.23 | 15.88 | 493% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.80 | 15.23 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers