Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFLGX vs JVMSX
HFLGX vs JVMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFLGX vs JVMSX
Hennessy Cornerstone Large Growth I
Price$11.28
Change-$0.09 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.64M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R2
Price$27.43
Change-$0.32 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.46B
HFLGX vs JVMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFLGX vs. JVMSX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFLGX is a Buy and JVMSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMSX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. HFLGX (131M). HFLGX pays higher dividends than JVMSX: HFLGX (0.95) vs JVMSX (0.43). HFLGX was incepted earlier than JVMSX: HFLGX (16 years) vs JVMSX (13 years). HFLGX (1.27) and JVMSX (1.26) have similar cost to investors . HFLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. JVMSX (47.00). JVMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFLGX: JVMSX (0) vs HFLGX (2500). HFLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.99 vs. JVMSX (-3.29). JVMSX return over 5 years is better than : 50.13 vs. HFLGX (23.19).
| HFLGX | JVMSX | HFLGX / JVMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.25 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.26 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.985 | 2.313 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131M | 21.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.43 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.99 | -3.29 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.88 | 15.80 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.19 | 50.13 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.62 | 33.43 | -32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers