| HFGO | IWF | HFGO / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 17.336 | 20.001 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 186M | 128B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.18 | 328% |
| Turnover | 68.00 | 13.00 | 523% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 26 years | - |
| HFGO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 74% | 12 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 81% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SGMIX | 10.10 | 0.03 | +0.30% |
| SEI Global Managed Volatility I (SIMT) | |||
| JATNX | 69.57 | 0.19 | +0.27% |
| Janus Henderson Glb Tech and Innovt N | |||
| WBGSX | 6.78 | 0.01 | +0.15% |
| William Blair Growth N | |||
| UTPIX | 81.85 | N/A | N/A |
| ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Inv | |||
| VCIEX | 10.11 | -0.01 | -0.10% |
| VALIC Company I International Eqs Idx | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFGO has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HFGO jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HFGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFGO | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| NVDA - HFGO | 82% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| FLEX - HFGO | 75% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| AMZN - HFGO | 75% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| ARM - HFGO | 74% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| MSFT - HFGO | 74% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
More | ||||