Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFGO vs IWF
HFGO vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts HFGO vs IWF
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
Price$25.41
Change-$0.67 (-2.57%)
Volume$100
Net Assets175.3M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$451.99
Change-$7.19 (-1.57%)
Volume$1.15K
Net Assets120.15B
HFGO vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFGO vs. IWF commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFGO is a StrongBuy and IWF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 120B vs. HFGO (175M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than HFGO: IWF (-2.983) vs HFGO (-4.469). HFGO was incepted earlier than IWF: HFGO (4 years) vs IWF (26 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than HFGO (0.59). HFGO has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| HFGO | IWF | HFGO / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | -4.469 | -2.983 | 150% |
| Net Assets | 175M | 120B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.18 | 328% |
| Turnover | 68.00 | 13.00 | 523% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.36 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HFGO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
HFGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFGO has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HFGO jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HFGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFGO | 100% | -1.81% | ||
| NVDA - HFGO | 82% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| FLEX - HFGO | 75% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| AMZN - HFGO | 75% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| KKR - HFGO | 74% Closely correlated | -9.69% | ||
| MSFT - HFGO | 74% Closely correlated | -2.87% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.78% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -8.46% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -3.89% | ||
More | ||||