Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFGO vs IWF
HFGO vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts HFGO vs IWF
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
Price$26.97
Change-$0.14 (-0.52%)
Volume$100
Net Assets183.6M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$471.07
Change+$1.15 (+0.24%)
Volume$2.64K
Net Assets122.83B
HFGO vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFGO vs. IWF commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFGO is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 123B vs. HFGO (184M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than HFGO: IWF (17.366) vs HFGO (14.713). HFGO was incepted earlier than IWF: HFGO (4 years) vs IWF (26 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than HFGO (0.59). HFGO has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| HFGO | IWF | HFGO / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 14.713 | 17.366 | 85% |
| Net Assets | 184M | 123B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.18 | 328% |
| Turnover | 68.00 | 13.00 | 523% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HFGO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 87% | 18 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSEE | 57.08 | -0.69 | -1.19% |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emer Mkt Eq ETF | |||
| PJFV | 81.16 | -1.29 | -1.56% |
| PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF | |||
| XMHQ | 101.06 | -2.13 | -2.06% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | |||
| FNGS | 70.39 | -1.61 | -2.24% |
| MicroSectors™ FANG+™ ETN | |||
| SMCY | 10.07 | -0.93 | -8.45% |
| YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
HFGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFGO has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HFGO jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HFGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFGO | 100% | -2.62% | ||
| NVDA - HFGO | 82% Closely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| FLEX - HFGO | 75% Closely correlated | -5.39% | ||
| AMZN - HFGO | 75% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| MSFT - HFGO | 74% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| ARM - HFGO | 74% Closely correlated | -5.67% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -2.12% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
More | ||||