It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HFFG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePFGC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HFFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFGC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
HFFG (@Food Distributors) experienced а -9.19% price change this week, while PFGC (@Food Distributors) price change was -4.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.73%.
HFFG is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
PFGC is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.
HFFG | PFGC | HFFG / PFGC | |
Capitalization | 183M | 11.5B | 2% |
EBITDA | 34.8M | 1.35B | 3% |
Gain YTD | -35.206 | 22.039 | -160% |
P/E Ratio | 357.14 | 27.04 | 1,321% |
Revenue | 1.15B | 57.9B | 2% |
Total Cash | 15.2M | 16.4M | 93% |
Total Debt | 203M | 5.04B | 4% |
HFFG | PFGC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HFFG's Valuation (66) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as PFGC (69). This means that HFFG’s stock grew similarly to PFGC’s over the last 12 months.
PFGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFFG (100). This means that PFGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFFG’s over the last 12 months.
PFGC's SMR Rating (65) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as HFFG (90). This means that PFGC’s stock grew similarly to HFFG’s over the last 12 months.
PFGC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as HFFG (56). This means that PFGC’s stock grew similarly to HFFG’s over the last 12 months.
PFGC's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFFG (77). This means that PFGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFFG’s over the last 12 months.
HFFG | PFGC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago52% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago74% | 18 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 3 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFFG has been loosely correlated with ANDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HFFG jumps, then ANDE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HFFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HFFG | 100% | +4.22% | ||
ANDE - HFFG | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.33% | ||
SPTN - HFFG | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SYY - HFFG | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
CHEF - HFFG | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
PFGC - HFFG | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFGC has been closely correlated with USFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFGC jumps, then USFD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFGC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PFGC | 100% | -0.08% | ||
USFD - PFGC | 77% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
CHEF - PFGC | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
SYY - PFGC | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
UNFI - PFGC | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.26% | ||
AVO - PFGC | 27% Poorly correlated | +17.29% | ||
More |