Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFDTX vs VIMSX
HFDTX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFDTX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps R5
Price$19.81
Change+$0.10 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.10
Change+$0.60 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.45B
HFDTX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDTX vs. VIMSX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDTX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 192B vs. HFDTX (1.01B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HFDTX: VIMSX (1.40) vs HFDTX (0.32). HFDTX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HFDTX (9 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HFDTX (0.92) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HFDTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). HFDTX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: HFDTX (0) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. HFDTX (2.93). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 70.78 vs. HFDTX (35.29).
| HFDTX | VIMSX | HFDTX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.17 | 541% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.17 | 541% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.166 | 9.818 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 192B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.40 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.93 | 17.91 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.95 | 42.07 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.29 | 70.78 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement