Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFDSX vs VIMSX
HFDSX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFDSX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps R4
Price$19.15
Change-$0.04 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets970.94M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$78.00
Change-$0.19 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.76B
HFDSX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDSX vs. VIMSX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDSX is a Buy and VIMSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 197B vs. HFDSX (971M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HFDSX: VIMSX (1.37) vs HFDSX (0.04). HFDSX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HFDSX (9 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HFDSX (1.22) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HFDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). HFDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: HFDSX (0) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.31 vs. HFDSX (-1.86). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 62.16 vs. HFDSX (24.55).
| HFDSX | VIMSX | HFDSX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.17 | 718% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.17 | 718% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.571 | 8.291 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 971M | 197B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.37 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.86 | 14.31 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.02 | 26.39 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.55 | 62.16 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 125.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement