Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFDSX vs VIMSX
HFDSX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFDSX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps R4
Price$19.65
Change+$0.10 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.10
Change+$0.60 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.45B
HFDSX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDSX vs. VIMSX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDSX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 192B vs. HFDSX (1.01B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HFDSX: VIMSX (1.40) vs HFDSX (0.04). HFDSX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HFDSX (9 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HFDSX (1.22) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HFDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). HFDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: HFDSX (0) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. HFDSX (2.54). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 70.78 vs. HFDSX (33.69).
| HFDSX | VIMSX | HFDSX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.17 | 718% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.17 | 718% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.025 | 9.818 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 192B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.40 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.54 | 17.91 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.87 | 42.07 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.69 | 70.78 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement