Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFDFX vs VIMSX
HFDFX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFDFX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps F
Price$19.87
Change+$0.10 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.10
Change+$0.60 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.45B
HFDFX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDFX vs. VIMSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDFX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 192B vs. HFDFX (1.01B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HFDFX: VIMSX (1.40) vs HFDFX (0.42). HFDFX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HFDFX (8 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HFDFX (0.81) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HFDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFDFX: VIMSX (3000) vs HFDFX (1000000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. HFDFX (3.09). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 70.78 vs. HFDFX (36.05).
| HFDFX | VIMSX | HFDFX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.265 | 9.818 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 192B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 1.40 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.09 | 17.91 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.42 | 42.07 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.05 | 70.78 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement