Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFDFX vs VIMSX
HFDFX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFDFX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps F
Price$19.87
Change+$0.11 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets952.36M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.67
Change+$0.61 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.28B
HFDFX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDFX vs. VIMSX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDFX is a Hold and VIMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 201B vs. HFDFX (952M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HFDFX: VIMSX (1.36) vs HFDFX (0.41). HFDFX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HFDFX (9 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HFDFX (0.81) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HFDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFDFX: VIMSX (3000) vs HFDFX (1000000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.72 vs. HFDFX (-4.46). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 58.22 vs. HFDFX (26.84).
| HFDFX | VIMSX | HFDFX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.265 | 10.639 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 952M | 201B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.36 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.46 | 8.72 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.87 | 57.43 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.84 | 58.22 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 142.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement