Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFDCX vs VIMSX
HFDCX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFDCX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps C
Price$17.83
Change-$0.05 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets970.94M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$78.00
Change-$0.19 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.76B
HFDCX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDCX vs. VIMSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDCX is a Buy and VIMSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 197B vs. HFDCX (971M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HFDCX: VIMSX (1.37) vs HFDCX (0.00). HFDCX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HFDCX (9 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HFDCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HFDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). HFDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: HFDCX (2000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.31 vs. HFDCX (-3.10). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 62.16 vs. HFDCX (18.55).
| HFDCX | VIMSX | HFDCX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.17 | 1,124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.17 | 1,124% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.054 | 8.291 | -13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 971M | 197B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.10 | 14.31 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.97 | 26.39 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.55 | 62.16 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 125.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement