Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFDCX vs VIMSX
HFDCX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFDCX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps C
Price$17.94
Change+$0.10 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets989.08M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$77.52
Change+$0.46 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.28B
HFDCX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDCX vs. VIMSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDCX is a StrongBuy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. HFDCX (989M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HFDCX: VIMSX (1.40) vs HFDCX (0.00). HFDCX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HFDCX (9 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HFDCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HFDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). HFDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: HFDCX (2000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.63 vs. HFDCX (0.62). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 73.64 vs. HFDCX (29.25).
| HFDCX | VIMSX | HFDCX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.17 | 1,124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.17 | 1,124% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.444 | 7.625 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 989M | 185B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.62 | 17.63 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.03 | 43.06 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.25 | 73.64 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 127.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement