Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFDCX vs VIMAX
HFDCX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts HFDCX vs VIMAX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps C
Price$17.83
Change-$0.05 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets970.94M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$353.82
Change-$0.86 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.76B
HFDCX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDCX vs. VIMAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDCX is a Buy and VIMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 197B vs. HFDCX (971M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than HFDCX: VIMAX (1.49) vs HFDCX (0.00). HFDCX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: HFDCX (9 years) vs VIMAX (24 years). HFDCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). HFDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMAX (16.00). HFDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMAX: HFDCX (2000) vs VIMAX (3000). VIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. HFDCX (-3.10). VIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.28 vs. HFDCX (18.55).
| HFDCX | VIMAX | HFDCX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.05 | 3,820% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.05 | 3,820% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.054 | 8.313 | -13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 971M | 197B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.10 | 14.33 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.97 | 26.45 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.55 | 62.28 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 125.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement