Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCGX vs NAESX
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HFCGX vs NAESX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$32.23
Change-$0.20 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets466.97M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.91
Change-$2.72 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCGX vs. NAESX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCGX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. HFCGX (467M). NAESX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: NAESX (1.22) vs HFCGX (0.11). HFCGX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HFCGX (29 years) vs NAESX (65 years). HFCGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: HFCGX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.33 vs. HFCGX (-14.70). HFCGX (45.05) and NAESX (44.93) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HFCGX | NAESX | HFCGX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.17 | 759% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.17 | 759% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.257 | 4.359 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 467M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 1.22 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.70 | -0.33 | 4,414% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.31 | 31.86 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.05 | 44.93 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.34 | 129.99 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement