Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCGX vs NAESX
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HFCGX vs NAESX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$35.10
Change+$3.15 (+9.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets490.89M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$130.40
Change+$7.85 (+6.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.31B
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCGX vs. NAESX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCGX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. HFCGX (491M). NAESX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: NAESX (1.16) vs HFCGX (0.00). HFCGX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HFCGX (29 years) vs NAESX (65 years). HFCGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: HFCGX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.68 vs. HFCGX (8.30). NAESX (31.77) and HFCGX (30.98) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HFCGX | NAESX | HFCGX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.17 | 759% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.17 | 759% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.247 | 5.519 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 491M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.16 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.30 | 10.68 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.36 | 33.00 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.98 | 31.77 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.25 | 185.98 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers