Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCGX vs NAESX
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HFCGX vs NAESX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$33.69
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets480.65M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$125.95
Change-$0.25 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.34B
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCGX vs. NAESX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCGX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. HFCGX (481M). NAESX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: NAESX (1.21) vs HFCGX (0.10). HFCGX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HFCGX (29 years) vs NAESX (65 years). HFCGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: HFCGX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.55 vs. HFCGX (3.92). NAESX (36.08) and HFCGX (35.43) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HFCGX | NAESX | HFCGX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.17 | 759% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.17 | 759% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.844 | 9.616 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 481M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 1.21 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.92 | 7.55 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.58 | 45.02 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.43 | 36.08 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.80 | 141.47 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers