Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCGX vs NAESX
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HFCGX vs NAESX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$32.12
Change+$0.31 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets463.27M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.98
Change+$1.67 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCGX vs. NAESX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCGX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. HFCGX (463M). NAESX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: NAESX (1.23) vs HFCGX (0.11). HFCGX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HFCGX (29 years) vs NAESX (65 years). HFCGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: HFCGX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.20 vs. HFCGX (-11.26). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 59.92 vs. HFCGX (52.04).
| HFCGX | NAESX | HFCGX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.17 | 759% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.17 | 759% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.911 | 7.031 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 463M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 1.23 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.26 | 6.20 | -182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.26 | 45.67 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.04 | 59.92 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.37 | 133.16 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement