HFBL
Price
$13.72
Change
+$0.48 (+3.63%)
Updated
Jul 25, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
40.43M
WSFS
Price
$56.36
Change
-$0.25 (-0.44%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.71B
92 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HFBL vs WSFS

Header iconHFBL vs WSFS Comparison
Open Charts HFBL vs WSFSBanner chart's image
Home Federal Ban
Price$13.72
Change+$0.48 (+3.63%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization40.43M
WSFS Financial
Price$56.36
Change-$0.25 (-0.44%)
Volume$491.63K
Capitalization2.71B
HFBL vs WSFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HFBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HFBL vs. WSFS commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFBL is a Hold and WSFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HFBL: $13.24 vs. WSFS: $56.36)
Brand notoriety: HFBL and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HFBL: 23% vs. WSFS: 149%
Market capitalization -- HFBL: $40.43M vs. WSFS: $2.71B
HFBL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $40.43M. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HFBL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HFBL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WSFS is a better buy in the long-term than HFBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HFBL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HFBL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HFBL is a better buy in the short-term than WSFS.

Price Growth

HFBL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.07% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSFS($2.71B) has a higher market cap than HFBL($40.4M). WSFS has higher P/E ratio than HFBL: WSFS (10.04) vs HFBL (8.34). HFBL YTD gains are higher at: 7.619 vs. WSFS (6.685). WSFS has more cash in the bank: 606M vs. HFBL (7.57M). HFBL has less debt than WSFS: HFBL (15M) vs WSFS (895M). WSFS has higher revenues than HFBL: WSFS (1.02B) vs HFBL (22.5M).
HFBLWSFSHFBL / WSFS
Capitalization40.4M2.71B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.6196.685114%
P/E Ratio8.3410.0483%
Revenue22.5M1.02B2%
Total Cash7.57M606M1%
Total Debt15M895M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HFBL vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
HFBL
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
507
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7635
SMR RATING
1..100
6911
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5553
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1958
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HFBL's Valuation (23) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSFS (64). This means that HFBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFBL (76). This means that WSFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's SMR Rating (11) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFBL (69). This means that WSFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as HFBL (55). This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

HFBL's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSFS (58). This means that HFBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HFBLWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HFBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYTFX7.890.05
+0.64%
Royce Small-Cap Total Return Svc
JAENX147.740.93
+0.63%
Janus Henderson Enterprise T
BRSUX14.700.09
+0.62%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R4
TAGHX33.180.17
+0.52%
Transamerica US Growth R6
SOAAX8.54N/A
N/A
Spirit of America Real Estate Inc & Gr A

HFBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HFBL and KEY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFBL and KEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFBL
1D Price
Change %
HFBL100%
N/A
KEY - HFBL
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
WSFS - HFBL
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
BANC - HFBL
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.56%
RF - HFBL
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
TFC - HFBL
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
More

WSFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSFS has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WSFS jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSFS
1D Price
Change %
WSFS100%
-0.44%
FNB - WSFS
92%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
STBA - WSFS
92%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
ABCB - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
UCB - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
UBSI - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
More