HFBL
Price
$18.00
Change
-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
55.59M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
USMT
Price
$5.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
83.48M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HFBL vs USMT

Header iconHFBL vs USMT Comparison
Open Charts HFBL vs USMTBanner chart's image
Home Federal Ban
Price$18.00
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Volume$890
Capitalization55.59M
US Metro Ban
Price$5.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization83.48M
HFBL vs USMT Comparison Chart in %
HFBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USMT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HFBL vs. USMT commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFBL is a Buy and USMT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (HFBL: $18.00 vs. USMT: $5.05)
Brand notoriety: HFBL and USMT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HFBL: 37% vs. USMT: 2%
Market capitalization -- HFBL: $55.59M vs. USMT: $83.48M
HFBL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $55.59M. USMT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $83.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HFBL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSMT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HFBL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • USMT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, USMT is a better buy in the long-term than HFBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HFBL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USMT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HFBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • USMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HFBL is a better buy in the short-term than USMT.

Price Growth

HFBL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +12.57% price change this week, while USMT (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.05% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USMT($83.5M) has a higher market cap than HFBL($55.6M). HFBL has higher P/E ratio than USMT: HFBL (12.24) vs USMT (8.71). USMT (50.873) and HFBL (49.245) have similar YTD gains . USMT has more cash in the bank: 12.7M vs. HFBL (2.07M). HFBL has less debt than USMT: HFBL (4M) vs USMT (20M). USMT has higher revenues than HFBL: USMT (51.2M) vs HFBL (20.5M).
HFBLUSMTHFBL / USMT
Capitalization55.6M83.5M67%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD49.24550.87397%
P/E Ratio12.248.71141%
Revenue20.5M51.2M40%
Total Cash2.07M12.7M16%
Total Debt4M20M20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HFBL vs USMT: Fundamental Ratings
HFBL
USMT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3470
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5325
SMR RATING
1..100
7266
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3624
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

USMT's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as HFBL (43) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that USMT’s stock grew similarly to HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

USMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as HFBL (53) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that USMT’s stock grew similarly to HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

USMT's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as HFBL (72) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that USMT’s stock grew similarly to HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

HFBL's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as USMT (47) in the null industry. This means that HFBL’s stock grew similarly to USMT’s over the last 12 months.

USMT's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as HFBL (36) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that USMT’s stock grew similarly to HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HFBLUSMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
29%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HFBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USMT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FINMF57.410.17
+0.30%
Leonardo S.P.A.
ABSSF3.14N/A
N/A
AirBoss of America Corp.
BJINF3.98N/A
N/A
Beijing Enterprises Holdings Ltd.
KNOIF20.21N/A
N/A
KONOIKE TRANSPORTATION CO LTD.
KPIFF0.03N/A
-7.97%
Edgewater Wireless Systems, Inc.

HFBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HFBL and FUSB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFBL and FUSB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFBL
1D Price
Change %
HFBL100%
-0.06%
FUSB - HFBL
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
BCAL - HFBL
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
FCAP - HFBL
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.07%
OVBC - HFBL
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
TFIN - HFBL
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
More

USMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USMT and MZTFF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USMT and MZTFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USMT
1D Price
Change %
USMT100%
N/A
MZTFF - USMT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSBQ - USMT
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
DENI - USMT
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
BBBK - USMT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFBL - USMT
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
More