HFBA
Price
$24.05
Change
-$0.55 (-2.24%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
27.97M
RF
Price
$24.57
Change
-$0.23 (-0.93%)
Updated
Jul 7, 12:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.9B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HFBA vs RF

Header iconHFBA vs RF Comparison
Open Charts HFBA vs RFBanner chart's image
HFB Financial
Price$24.05
Change-$0.55 (-2.24%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization27.97M
Regions Financial
Price$24.57
Change-$0.23 (-0.93%)
Volume$7.1K
Capitalization18.9B
HFBA vs RF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HFBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HFBA vs. RF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFBA is a Hold and RF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HFBA: $24.05 vs. RF: $24.80)
Brand notoriety: HFBA: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HFBA: 86% vs. RF: 58%
Market capitalization -- HFBA: $27.97M vs. RF: $18.9B
HFBA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $27.97M. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HFBA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HFBA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the long-term than HFBA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HFBA’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HFBA’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the short-term than HFBA.

Price Growth

HFBA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.80% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

RF is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.12% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($18.9B) has a higher market cap than HFBA($28M). RF YTD gains are higher at: 7.823 vs. HFBA (-18.684). RF has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. HFBA (4.78M). HFBA has less debt than RF: HFBA (28.9M) vs RF (2.33B). RF has higher revenues than HFBA: RF (7.57B) vs HFBA (1.57M).
HFBARFHFBA / RF
Capitalization28M18.9B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-18.6847.823-239%
P/E RatioN/A9.74-
Revenue1.57M7.57B0%
Total Cash4.78M1.55B0%
Total Debt28.9M2.33B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HFBA vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
HFBA
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9027
SMR RATING
1..100
697
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8412
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1443
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HFBA's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RF (81) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HFBA’s stock grew significantly faster than RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFBA (90) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFBA’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFBA (69) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFBA’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for HFBA (84) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew significantly faster than HFBA’s over the last 12 months.

HFBA's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as RF (43) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HFBA’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HFBARF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HFBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLCA42.120.35
+0.84%
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
IPDP20.370.14
+0.69%
Dividend Performers ETF
BCV19.130.13
+0.68%
Bancroft Fund Ltd
UTG35.960.14
+0.39%
Reaves Utility Income Fund
CCZ62.95N/A
N/A
Comcast Holdings Corp

HFBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HFBA and BNCZF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFBA and BNCZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFBA
1D Price
Change %
HFBA100%
-2.24%
BNCZF - HFBA
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFR - HFBA
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
DSBX - HFBA
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RF - HFBA
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
FIBK - HFBA
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with HOMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then HOMB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+1.02%
HOMB - RF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
AUB - RF
80%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
HTH - RF
74%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
CPF - RF
73%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
FULT - RF
73%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
More