Advertisement
HESAF vs LANV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HESAF is a Hold and LANV is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HESAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLANV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HESAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LANV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HESAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LANV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HESAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LANV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HESAF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а +5.30% price change this week, while LANV (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was -10.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.22%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+0.34% weekly)The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.
| HESAF | LANV | HESAF / LANV | |
| Capitalization | 273B | 199M | 137,186% |
| EBITDA | 7.6B | -122.6M | -6,198% |
| Gain YTD | 3.828 | -15.423 | -25% |
| P/E Ratio | 52.24 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 15.7B | 291M | 5,395% |
| Total Cash | 10.3B | 29.7M | 34,680% |
| Total Debt | 2.06B | 441M | 467% |
HESAF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HESAF | LANV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 17 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 53% | 1 day ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
HESAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HESAF has been closely correlated with HESAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HESAF jumps, then HESAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HESAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HESAF | 100% | +0.85% | ||
| HESAY - HESAF | 85% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| LVMUY - HESAF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| LVMHF - HESAF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| CFRUY - HESAF | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PPRUY - HESAF | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
More | ||||
LANV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LANV and BGI have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LANV and BGI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LANV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LANV | 100% | -4.76% | ||
| BGI - LANV | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
| LVMUY - LANV | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.26% | ||
| WOSGF - LANV | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HESAY - LANV | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
| HESAF - LANV | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
More | ||||