Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HEQFX vs VIMSX
HEQFX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HEQFX vs VIMSX
Monteagle Opportunity Equity I
Price$4.93
Change-$0.11 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.75M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$81.03
Change+$1.02 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.74B
HEQFX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HEQFX vs. VIMSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEQFX is a Hold and VIMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. HEQFX (16.8M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HEQFX: VIMSX (1.37) vs HEQFX (0.26). HEQFX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HEQFX (28 years) vs VIMSX (28 years). HEQFX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HEQFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). HEQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: HEQFX (2000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. HEQFX (2.80). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 38.77 vs. HEQFX (-24.29).
| HEQFX | VIMSX | HEQFX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.17 | 1,065% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.17 | 1,065% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.794 | 2.272 | 255% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.8M | 199B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.37 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.80 | 8.23 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.44 | 33.97 | -37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.29 | 38.77 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.25 | 180.15 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers