HEPS
Price
$2.66
Change
+$0.03 (+1.14%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
857.38M
MI
Price
$2.38
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
12.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HEPS vs MI

Header iconHEPS vs MI Comparison
Open Charts HEPS vs MIBanner chart's image
D-Market Electronic Services & Trading
Price$2.66
Change+$0.03 (+1.14%)
Volume$233.57K
Capitalization857.38M
NFT
Price$2.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.8K
Capitalization12.06M
HEPS vs MI Comparison Chart
Loading...
HEPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HEPS vs. MI commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEPS is a StrongBuy and MI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (HEPS: $2.65 vs. MI: $2.45)
Brand notoriety: HEPS and MI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HEPS: 73% vs. MI: 14%
Market capitalization -- HEPS: $857.38M vs. MI: $12.06M
HEPS [@Internet Retail] is valued at $857.38M. MI’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $12.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.21T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $42.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HEPS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HEPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MI is a better buy in the long-term than HEPS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HEPS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HEPS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MI is a better buy in the short-term than HEPS.

Price Growth

HEPS (@Internet Retail) experienced а -5.36% price change this week, while MI (@Internet Retail) price change was -2.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+2.57% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HEPS($857M) has a higher market cap than MI($12.1M). HEPS has higher P/E ratio than MI: HEPS (106.20) vs MI (1.56). HEPS YTD gains are higher at: -12.541 vs. MI (-30.791). HEPS has more cash in the bank: 8.13B vs. MI (8.42M). MI has less debt than HEPS: MI (2.05M) vs HEPS (1.7B).
HEPSMIHEPS / MI
Capitalization857M12.1M7,083%
EBITDA2.43BN/A-
Gain YTD-12.541-30.79141%
P/E Ratio106.201.566,827%
Revenue39.9BN/A-
Total Cash8.13B8.42M96,567%
Total Debt1.7B2.05M82,878%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MI: Fundamental Ratings
MI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
72
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HEPSMI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HEPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

HEPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HEPS and DADA have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HEPS and DADA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HEPS
1D Price
Change %
HEPS100%
-0.38%
DADA - HEPS
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
AMZN - HEPS
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
MI - HEPS
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.11%
BZUN - HEPS
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
BABA - HEPS
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
More

MI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MI and CPNG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MI and CPNG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MI
1D Price
Change %
MI100%
+3.11%
CPNG - MI
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
BYON - MI
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
AMZN - MI
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
HEPS - MI
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
JMIA - MI
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.79%
More