Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HEOMX vs RWIBX
HEOMX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts HEOMX vs RWIBX
Hartford Climate Opportunities A
Price$18.79
Change-$0.33 (-1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.97M
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R2
Price$74.91
Change-$1.38 (-1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.09B
HEOMX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HEOMX vs. RWIBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEOMX is a Hold and RWIBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 144B vs. HEOMX (121M). RWIBX pays higher dividends than HEOMX: RWIBX (0.74) vs HEOMX (0.26). HEOMX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: HEOMX (10 years) vs RWIBX (23 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than HEOMX (1.17). HEOMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWIBX (27.00). RWIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HEOMX: RWIBX (250) vs HEOMX (2000). RWIBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.11 vs. HEOMX (9.77). RWIBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.51 vs. HEOMX (32.14).
| HEOMX | RWIBX | HEOMX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.51 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.51 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.072 | 22.622 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 121M | 144B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.74 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.77 | 14.11 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.88 | 52.84 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.14 | 43.51 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement