Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HELO vs QFLR
HELO vs QFLR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HELO vs. QFLR commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HELO is a Hold and QFLR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HELO has more net assets: 3.46B vs. QFLR (360M). QFLR has a higher annual dividend yield than HELO: QFLR (14.736) vs HELO (5.153). HELO was incepted earlier than QFLR: HELO (2 years) vs QFLR (2 years). HELO (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than QFLR (0.89). HELO has a higher turnover QFLR (20.00) vs QFLR (20.00).
| HELO | QFLR | HELO / QFLR | |
| Gain YTD | 5.153 | 14.736 | 35% |
| Net Assets | 3.46B | 360M | 960% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.89 | 56% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 20.00 | 150% |
| Yield | 0.72 | 0.02 | 2,995% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HELO | QFLR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 17 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 9 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HELO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HELO has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HELO jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HELO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HELO | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| GS - HELO | 79% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| AXP - HELO | 79% Closely correlated | +7.27% | ||
| DOV - HELO | 77% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| AMZN - HELO | 76% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| BX - HELO | 76% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
More | ||||
QFLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QFLR has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QFLR jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QFLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QFLR | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| NVDA - QFLR | 75% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| AMZN - QFLR | 73% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| MSFT - QFLR | 70% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| AVGO - QFLR | 69% Closely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| LRCX - QFLR | 69% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
More | ||||