HEHSF
Price
$6.70
Change
+$0.40 (+6.35%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
368.58M
PIHG
Price
$1.50
Change
-$0.49 (-24.62%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

HEHSF vs PIHG

Header iconHEHSF vs PIHG Comparison
Open Charts HEHSF vs PIHGBanner chart's image
Hellenic Stock Exchanges
Price$6.70
Change+$0.40 (+6.35%)
Volume$333
Capitalization368.58M
Plural Industry Holding Group
Price$1.50
Change-$0.49 (-24.62%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
HEHSF vs PIHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HEHSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HEHSF vs. PIHG commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEHSF is a Hold and PIHG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HEHSF: $6.70 vs. PIHG: $1.50)
Brand notoriety: HEHSF and PIHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HEHSF: 67% vs. PIHG: 92%
Market capitalization -- HEHSF: $368.58M vs. PIHG: $0
HEHSF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $368.58M. PIHG’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HEHSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePIHG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HEHSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PIHG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HEHSF is a better buy in the long-term than PIHG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HEHSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIHG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HEHSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PIHG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIHG is a better buy in the short-term than HEHSF.

Price Growth

HEHSF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PIHG (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIHG YTD gains are higher at: 14900.000 vs. HEHSF (41.053).
HEHSFPIHGHEHSF / PIHG
Capitalization369MN/A-
EBITDA14.4MN/A-
Gain YTD41.05314900.0000%
P/E Ratio26.53N/A-
Revenue39.3MN/A-
Total Cash65MN/A-
Total Debt221KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HEHSF vs PIHG: Fundamental Ratings
HEHSF
PIHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14100
SMR RATING
1..100
52100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HEHSF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as PIHG (50). This means that HEHSF’s stock grew similarly to PIHG’s over the last 12 months.

HEHSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PIHG (100). This means that HEHSF’s stock grew significantly faster than PIHG’s over the last 12 months.

HEHSF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIHG (100). This means that HEHSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIHG’s over the last 12 months.

PIHG's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HEHSF (45). This means that PIHG’s stock grew similarly to HEHSF’s over the last 12 months.

HEHSF's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIHG (100). This means that HEHSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIHG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HEHSFPIHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HEHSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LADSX21.940.32
+1.48%
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R4
PGILX37.680.29
+0.78%
Putnam Focused Equity Y
YOVAX16.970.12
+0.71%
Yorktown Small-Cap A
NBPBX48.790.28
+0.58%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Adv
MYINX9.120.01
+0.11%
NYLI WMC International Rsrch Eq Inv Cl

HEHSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HEHSF has been closely correlated with GSIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HEHSF jumps, then GSIW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HEHSF
1D Price
Change %
HEHSF100%
N/A
GSIW - HEHSF
72%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
ABIT - HEHSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+17.03%
PJT - HEHSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
MIGI - HEHSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.19%
DPXCF - HEHSF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PIHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PIHG and MNXBF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PIHG and MNXBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIHG
1D Price
Change %
PIHG100%
N/A
MNXBF - PIHG
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUXTF - PIHG
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNNTF - PIHG
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEHSF - PIHG
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKXCY - PIHG
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
More