It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HEHSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHKXCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HEHSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HKXCY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
HEHSF (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -1.60% price change this week, while HKXCY (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +2.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.38%.
HKXCY is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| HEHSF | HKXCY | HEHSF / HKXCY | |
| Capitalization | 420M | 71B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 32M | 24.5B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 55.368 | 54.421 | 102% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.12 | 35.46 | 43% |
| Revenue | 61.2M | 20.3B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 75.1M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 351K | N/A | - |
HEHSF | HKXCY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 16 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HEHSF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as HKXCY (28). This means that HEHSF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.
HEHSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HKXCY (71). This means that HEHSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.
HKXCY's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HEHSF (43). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to HEHSF’s over the last 12 months.
HEHSF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as HKXCY (46). This means that HEHSF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.
HKXCY's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as HEHSF (55). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to HEHSF’s over the last 12 months.
| HEHSF | HKXCY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 18% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 16% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LSIUX | 13.98 | 0.09 | +0.65% |
| ClearBridge International Value IS | |||
| PIIDX | 16.66 | 0.08 | +0.48% |
| Principal International Equity R-6 | |||
| VLCGX | 18.31 | N/A | N/A |
| VALIC Company I Large Cap Core | |||
| FSYJX | 11.84 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Eq | |||
| TEMRX | 10.47 | -0.01 | -0.10% |
| Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq A | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that HEHSF and SLNH have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HEHSF and SLNH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HEHSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEHSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SLNH - HEHSF | 23% Poorly correlated | -10.97% | ||
| ABIT - HEHSF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| HKXCY - HEHSF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| DSEEY - HEHSF | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.09% | ||
| HYHDF - HEHSF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCY has been loosely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCY jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HKXCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKXCY | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| FUTU - HKXCY | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| TIGR - HKXCY | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| HKXCF - HKXCY | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.43% | ||
| TOP - HKXCY | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.36% | ||
| MQBKY - HKXCY | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.69% | ||
More | ||||