HECOF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.54M
TAOFF
Price
$4.25
Change
-$0.25 (-5.56%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.66B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HECOF vs TAOFF

Header iconHECOF vs TAOFF Comparison
Open Charts HECOF vs TAOFFBanner chart's image
GLOBAL HELIUM
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization1.54M
IPERIONX
Price$4.25
Change-$0.25 (-5.56%)
Volume$62.22K
Capitalization1.66B
HECOF vs TAOFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HECOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HECOF vs. TAOFF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HECOF is a Hold and TAOFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HECOF: $0.03 vs. TAOFF: $4.25)
Brand notoriety: HECOF and TAOFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HECOF: 33% vs. TAOFF: 143%
Market capitalization -- HECOF: $1.54M vs. TAOFF: $1.66B
HECOF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.54M. TAOFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HECOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAOFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HECOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TAOFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HECOF is a better buy in the long-term than TAOFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HECOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAOFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HECOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TAOFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HECOF is a better buy in the short-term than TAOFF.

Price Growth

HECOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +12.68% price change this week, while TAOFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -5.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAOFF($1.66B) has a higher market cap than HECOF($1.54M). HECOF YTD gains are higher at: 24.400 vs. TAOFF (19.048). HECOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.1M vs. TAOFF (-27.37M). TAOFF has more cash in the bank: 77.1M vs. HECOF (271K). HECOF has less debt than TAOFF: HECOF (0) vs TAOFF (4.19M). HECOF (0) and TAOFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
HECOFTAOFFHECOF / TAOFF
Capitalization1.54M1.66B0%
EBITDA-4.1M-27.37M15%
Gain YTD24.40019.048128%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash271K77.1M0%
Total Debt04.19M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HECOFTAOFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HECOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DIECX45.900.46
+1.01%
BNY Mellon International Core Equity C
JSERX53.370.49
+0.93%
JPMorgan Small Cap Equity R5
VVILX30.430.13
+0.43%
Vulcan Value Partners Institutional
MIFOX33.350.06
+0.18%
Marsico Focus Institutional
CNGAX72.09-0.10
-0.14%
American Funds New Economy 529A

HECOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HECOF and PGXPF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HECOF and PGXPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HECOF
1D Price
Change %
HECOF100%
-9.91%
PGXPF - HECOF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
AFBOF - HECOF
13%
Poorly correlated
+3.83%
AWLIF - HECOF
11%
Poorly correlated
+9.89%
TMC - HECOF
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.05%
TAOFF - HECOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TAOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TAOFF and CAXPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAOFF and CAXPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAOFF
1D Price
Change %
TAOFF100%
N/A
CAXPF - TAOFF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FXRVF - TAOFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLI - TAOFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
ALLIF - TAOFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+15.38%
HECOF - TAOFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-9.91%
More