Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGCX vs RMEBX
HDGCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGCX vs RMEBX
Hartford Dividend and Growth C
Price$32.92
Change+$0.11 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.49B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.71
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
HDGCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. HDGCX (18.5B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than HDGCX: RMEBX (1.03) vs HDGCX (0.67). HDGCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGCX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). HDGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HDGCX (28.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGCX: RMEBX (250) vs HDGCX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.97 vs. HDGCX (3.16). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.21 vs. HDGCX (29.08).
| HDGCX | RMEBX | HDGCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 1.07 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 1.07 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.618 | 9.599 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.5B | 112B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.03 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.16 | 7.97 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.79 | 28.41 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.08 | 45.21 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.89 | 90.05 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers