Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGCX vs RMEBX
HDGCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGCX vs RMEBX
Hartford Dividend and Growth C
Price$35.48
Change-$0.39 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.24B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
HDGCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. HDGCX (18.2B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than HDGCX: RMEBX (1.05) vs HDGCX (0.68). HDGCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGCX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). HDGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HDGCX (28.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGCX: RMEBX (250) vs HDGCX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. HDGCX (0.50). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.80 vs. HDGCX (41.89).
| HDGCX | RMEBX | HDGCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 1.07 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 1.07 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.993 | 14.940 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.2B | 112B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.05 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.50 | 6.55 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.79 | 30.03 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.89 | 53.80 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.39 | 92.20 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers