Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGBX vs RMFCX
HDGBX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGBX vs RMFCX
Hartford Dividend and Growth HLS IB
Price$22.83
Change+$0.12 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.4B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.27
Change+$0.13 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.07B
HDGBX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGBX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGBX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. HDGBX (3.4B). HDGBX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HDGBX (1.52) vs RMFCX (1.21). HDGBX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGBX (28 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HDGBX (0.91) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . HDGBX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. HDGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HDGBX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. HDGBX (-5.96). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. HDGBX (14.60).
| HDGBX | RMFCX | HDGBX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.210 | 15.093 | -8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.4B | 112B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 1.21 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.96 | 6.67 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.00 | 30.56 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.60 | 54.90 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.17 | 94.04 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement