Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGBX vs RMFCX
HDGBX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGBX vs RMFCX
Hartford Dividend and Growth HLS IB
Price$21.92
Change+$0.15 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.33B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.27
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.09B
HDGBX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGBX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGBX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. HDGBX (3.33B). HDGBX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HDGBX (1.57) vs RMFCX (1.24). HDGBX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGBX (28 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HDGBX (0.91) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . HDGBX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. HDGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HDGBX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. HDGBX (-8.19). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.20 vs. HDGBX (22.71).
| HDGBX | RMFCX | HDGBX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.148 | 13.245 | -39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.33B | 111B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.24 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.19 | 6.41 | -128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.84 | 42.10 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.71 | 63.20 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.25 | 103.62 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement