HDALF
Price
$1.62
Change
-$0.08 (-4.71%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.59B
LKNCY
Price
$37.20
Change
+$0.83 (+2.28%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
10.55B
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HDALF vs LKNCY

Header iconHDALF vs LKNCY Comparison
Open Charts HDALF vs LKNCYBanner chart's image
Haidilao International
Price$1.62
Change-$0.08 (-4.71%)
Volume$1.25K
Capitalization9.59B
Luckin Coffee
Price$37.20
Change+$0.83 (+2.28%)
Volume$1.75M
Capitalization10.55B
HDALF vs LKNCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HDALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HDALF vs. LKNCY commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDALF is a Hold and LKNCY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (HDALF: $1.62 vs. LKNCY: $37.20)
Brand notoriety: HDALF and LKNCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HDALF: 85% vs. LKNCY: 88%
Market capitalization -- HDALF: $9.47B vs. LKNCY: $10.27B
HDALF [@Restaurants] is valued at $9.47B. LKNCY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $10.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $225.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HDALF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLKNCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HDALF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LKNCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LKNCY is a better buy in the long-term than HDALF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HDALF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LKNCY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HDALF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LKNCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HDALF is a better buy in the short-term than LKNCY.

Price Growth

HDALF (@Restaurants) experienced а -4.71% price change this week, while LKNCY (@Restaurants) price change was -1.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

LKNCY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.49% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LKNCY($10.6B) has a higher market cap than HDALF($9.59B). LKNCY has higher P/E ratio than HDALF: LKNCY (21.75) vs HDALF (14.31). LKNCY YTD gains are higher at: 44.916 vs. HDALF (-26.364).
HDALFLKNCYHDALF / LKNCY
Capitalization9.59B10.6B90%
EBITDAN/A6.56B-
Gain YTD-26.36444.916-59%
P/E Ratio14.3121.7566%
RevenueN/A41B-
Total CashN/A7.41B-
Total DebtN/A6.17B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HDALF vs LKNCY: Fundamental Ratings
HDALF
LKNCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10025
SMR RATING
1..100
9728
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6151
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HDALF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKNCY (63). This means that HDALF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKNCY’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HDALF (100). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew significantly faster than HDALF’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HDALF (97). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew significantly faster than HDALF’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HDALF (85). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HDALF’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as HDALF (61). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew similarly to HDALF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HDALFLKNCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HDALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSJP23.080.01
+0.04%
Invesco BulletShares 2025 HY Corp Bd ETF
APRJ24.88N/A
+0.02%
Innovator Premium Income 30 Bar ETF -Apr
BPH54.63-0.19
-0.35%
BP PLC ADRHEDGED BPH
PFF31.46-0.16
-0.51%
iShares Preferred&Income Securities ETF
BTCW114.63-4.04
-3.40%
WisdomTree Bitcoin Fund

HDALF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HDALF and LKNCY have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HDALF and LKNCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HDALF
1D Price
Change %
HDALF100%
N/A
LKNCY - HDALF
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
MARZF - HDALF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLFFF - HDALF
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.55%
JDWPF - HDALF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGGSF - HDALF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
More

LKNCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKNCY and YUMC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKNCY and YUMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKNCY
1D Price
Change %
LKNCY100%
+2.28%
YUMC - LKNCY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
HDALF - LKNCY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTYFF - LKNCY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGGSF - LKNCY
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
PZRIF - LKNCY
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
More