HCTPF
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
1.51B
IRCUF
Price
$6.24
Change
+$0.09 (+1.46%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCTPF vs IRCUF

Header iconHCTPF vs IRCUF Comparison
Open Charts HCTPF vs IRCUFBanner chart's image
Hutchison Port Holdings Trust
Price$0.14
Change+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization1.51B
Irish Continental Group
Price$6.24
Change+$0.09 (+1.46%)
Volume$1.14K
Capitalization1.09B
HCTPF vs IRCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HCTPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IRCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCTPF vs. IRCUF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCTPF is a Hold and IRCUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (HCTPF: $0.14 vs. IRCUF: $6.24)
Brand notoriety: HCTPF and IRCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCTPF: 4% vs. IRCUF: 44%
Market capitalization -- HCTPF: $1.51B vs. IRCUF: $1.09B
HCTPF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.51B. IRCUF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCTPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIRCUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HCTPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IRCUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IRCUF is a better buy in the long-term than HCTPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCTPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IRCUF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HCTPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IRCUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HCTPF and IRCUF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HCTPF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +10.00% price change this week, while IRCUF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+3.18% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCTPF($1.51B) has a higher market cap than IRCUF($1.09B). HCTPF (15.05) and IRCUF (14.85) have similar P/E ratio . IRCUF YTD gains are higher at: 17.514 vs. HCTPF (-4.322). HCTPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.04B vs. IRCUF (135M). HCTPF has more cash in the bank: 8.14B vs. IRCUF (41.3M). IRCUF has less debt than HCTPF: IRCUF (204M) vs HCTPF (25.3B). HCTPF has higher revenues than IRCUF: HCTPF (11.2B) vs IRCUF (604M).
HCTPFIRCUFHCTPF / IRCUF
Capitalization1.51B1.09B139%
EBITDA7.04B135M5,211%
Gain YTD-4.32217.514-25%
P/E Ratio15.0514.85101%
Revenue11.2B604M1,854%
Total Cash8.14B41.3M19,705%
Total Debt25.3B204M12,402%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCTPF vs IRCUF: Fundamental Ratings
HCTPF
IRCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4638
SMR RATING
1..100
9849
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4553
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9866
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCTPF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as IRCUF (27). This means that HCTPF’s stock grew similarly to IRCUF’s over the last 12 months.

IRCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as HCTPF (46). This means that IRCUF’s stock grew similarly to HCTPF’s over the last 12 months.

IRCUF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCTPF (98). This means that IRCUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCTPF’s over the last 12 months.

HCTPF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as IRCUF (53). This means that HCTPF’s stock grew similarly to IRCUF’s over the last 12 months.

IRCUF's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as HCTPF (98). This means that IRCUF’s stock grew similarly to HCTPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCTPFIRCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HCTPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IRCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JANVX84.440.81
+0.97%
Janus Henderson Venture D
FRDAX95.680.74
+0.78%
Franklin Rising Dividends Adv
FCVFX33.080.14
+0.43%
Fidelity Advisor Value C
MARFX24.080.09
+0.38%
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Institutional
CAMUX22.560.02
+0.09%
Cambiar SMID Institutional

HCTPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCTPF and NMPRY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCTPF and NMPRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCTPF
1D Price
Change %
HCTPF100%
N/A
NMPRY - HCTPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAIKY - HCTPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRCUF - HCTPF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTMAY - HCTPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HHULY - HCTPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IRCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IRCUF and HLAGF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IRCUF and HLAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRCUF
1D Price
Change %
IRCUF100%
N/A
HLAGF - IRCUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTMAY - IRCUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCTPF - IRCUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ICTEF - IRCUF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
HPGLY - IRCUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More