Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCOW vs IJJ
HCOW vs IJJ Comparison
Open Charts HCOW vs IJJ
Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF
Price$22.65
Change-$0.08 (-0.35%)
Volume$1.92K
Net Assets11.52M
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
Price$120.53
Change-$1.78 (-1.46%)
Volume$200.49K
Net Assets7.52B
HCOW vs IJJ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCOW vs. IJJ commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCOW is a Hold and IJJ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IJJ has more net assets: 7.52B vs. HCOW (11.5M). IJJ has a higher annual dividend yield than HCOW: IJJ (-3.187) vs HCOW (-7.558). HCOW was incepted earlier than IJJ: HCOW (2 years) vs IJJ (25 years). IJJ (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than HCOW (0.65). IJJ has a higher turnover HCOW (0.00) vs HCOW (0.00).
| HCOW | IJJ | HCOW / IJJ | |
| Gain YTD | -7.558 | -3.187 | 237% |
| Net Assets | 11.5M | 7.52B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.18 | 361% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 42.00 | - |
| Yield | 10.02 | 1.96 | 512% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HCOW | IJJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 76% | 26 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HCOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCOW has been closely correlated with NOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCOW jumps, then NOV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCOW | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| NOV - HCOW | 79% Closely correlated | +2.67% | ||
| SLB - HCOW | 78% Closely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| HAL - HCOW | 77% Closely correlated | +5.51% | ||
| MGY - HCOW | 77% Closely correlated | +2.58% | ||
| TKR - HCOW | 75% Closely correlated | -1.92% | ||
More | ||||
IJJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IJJ has been closely correlated with HOMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IJJ jumps, then HOMB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IJJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJJ | 100% | -1.46% | ||
| HOMB - IJJ | 82% Closely correlated | -2.34% | ||
| EQH - IJJ | 79% Closely correlated | -2.77% | ||
| GGG - IJJ | 78% Closely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| ITT - IJJ | 76% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| FBIN - IJJ | 76% Closely correlated | -2.82% | ||
More | ||||