Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMGX vs RGACX
HCMGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts HCMGX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.42
Change+$0.27 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
HCMGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMGX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMGX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. HCMGX (1.86B). RGACX pays higher dividends than HCMGX: RGACX (0.07) vs HCMGX (0.00). HCMGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: HCMGX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). HCMGX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). HCMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMGX: RGACX (250) vs HCMGX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.14 vs. HCMGX (6.77). HCMGX return over 5 years is better than : 83.09 vs. RGACX (46.50).
| HCMGX | RGACX | HCMGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.94 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.94 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.440 | 13.099 | 42% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 328B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.77 | 17.14 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.06 | 56.85 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.09 | 46.50 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 223.05 | 82.94 | 269% |