Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMGX vs RGACX
HCMGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts HCMGX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$79.90
Change+$0.78 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
HCMGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMGX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMGX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. HCMGX (1.81B). RGACX pays higher dividends than HCMGX: RGACX (0.07) vs HCMGX (0.00). HCMGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: HCMGX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). HCMGX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). HCMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMGX: RGACX (250) vs HCMGX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. HCMGX (-2.78). HCMGX return over 5 years is better than : 82.44 vs. RGACX (47.06).
| HCMGX | RGACX | HCMGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.94 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.94 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.250 | 10.988 | 20% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 323B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.78 | 10.28 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.63 | 58.08 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.44 | 47.06 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 212.63 | 82.67 | 257% |