Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMDX vs RGAGX
HCMDX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts HCMDX vs RGAGX
HCM Tactical Plus Investor
Price$28.80
Change+$0.12 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.85B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$84.62
Change+$0.29 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
HCMDX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMDX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMDX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. HCMDX (1.86B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: RGAGX (0.61) vs HCMDX (0.00). HCMDX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: HCMDX (11 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: RGAGX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.20 vs. HCMDX (5.07). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 74.55 vs. RGAGX (50.83).
| HCMDX | RGAGX | HCMDX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.30 | 923% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.30 | 923% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.956 | 13.508 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 328B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.07 | 18.20 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.31 | 59.73 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.55 | 50.83 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 195.99 | 89.40 | 219% |