Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMDX vs RGAGX
HCMDX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts HCMDX vs RGAGX
HCM Tactical Plus Investor
Price$29.39
Change+$0.42 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.88B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.49
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
HCMDX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMDX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMDX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. HCMDX (1.88B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: RGAGX (0.59) vs HCMDX (0.00). HCMDX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: HCMDX (11 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: RGAGX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.90 vs. HCMDX (10.58). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 55.84 vs. RGAGX (44.13).
| HCMDX | RGAGX | HCMDX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.30 | 923% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.30 | 923% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.997 | 16.016 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 332B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.58 | 18.90 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.36 | 61.40 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.84 | 44.13 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 232.50 | 102.81 | 226% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement