Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMDX vs RGAGX
HCMDX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts HCMDX vs RGAGX
HCM Tactical Plus Investor
Price$29.54
Change-$0.20 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.9B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
HCMDX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMDX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMDX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. HCMDX (1.9B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: RGAGX (0.60) vs HCMDX (0.00). HCMDX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: HCMDX (11 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: RGAGX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. HCMDX (8.60). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 63.84 vs. RGAGX (46.14).
| HCMDX | RGAGX | HCMDX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.30 | 923% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.30 | 923% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.653 | 14.500 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 329B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.60 | 15.11 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.10 | 43.78 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.84 | 46.14 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 201.74 | 90.14 | 224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement