Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMDX vs RGAGX
HCMDX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts HCMDX vs RGAGX
HCM Tactical Growth Investor
Price$25.67
Change-$0.50 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.68B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$78.43
Change-$0.94 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
HCMDX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMDX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMDX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. HCMDX (1.68B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: RGAGX (0.65) vs HCMDX (0.00). HCMDX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: HCMDX (11 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: RGAGX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. HCMDX (-5.87). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 72.17 vs. RGAGX (51.11).
| HCMDX | RGAGX | HCMDX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.30 | 923% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.30 | 923% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.450 | 5.205 | -124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 306B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.87 | 7.67 | -76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.19 | 54.66 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.17 | 51.11 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.51 | 75.62 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement