Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMDX vs RGAGX
HCMDX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts HCMDX vs RGAGX
HCM Tactical Growth Investor
Price$27.95
Change+$0.42 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$83.01
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
HCMDX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMDX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMDX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. HCMDX (1.81B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: RGAGX (0.61) vs HCMDX (0.00). HCMDX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: HCMDX (11 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: RGAGX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. HCMDX (-4.28). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 73.93 vs. RGAGX (51.38).
| HCMDX | RGAGX | HCMDX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.30 | 923% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.30 | 923% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.859 | 11.348 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 323B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.28 | 11.27 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.04 | 60.98 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.93 | 51.38 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 186.67 | 89.12 | 209% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement