Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMDX vs RGABX
HCMDX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts HCMDX vs RGABX
HCM Tactical Plus Investor
Price$32.64
Change+$0.11 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$78.76
Change+$0.33 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
HCMDX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMDX vs. RGABX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMDX is a Buy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. HCMDX (2.07B). HCMDX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . HCMDX was incepted earlier than RGABX: HCMDX (11 years) vs RGABX (24 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: RGABX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.29 vs. HCMDX (4.08). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 55.92 vs. RGABX (24.39).
| HCMDX | RGABX | HCMDX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 1.39 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 1.39 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.076 | 18.082 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 340B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.08 | 5.29 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.98 | 55.80 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.92 | 24.39 | 229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 238.91 | 77.97 | 306% |