Advertisement
HCMAU vs LWAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMAU is a StrongBuy and LWAC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HCMAU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLWAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HCMAU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LWAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
HCMAU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.15% price change this week, while LWAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.78%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (-0.01% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| HCMAU | LWAC | HCMAU / LWAC | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 300M | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | N/A | N/A | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
HCMAU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMAU has been loosely correlated with FORL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCMAU jumps, then FORL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCMAU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCMAU | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| FORL - HCMAU | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DYCQ - HCMAU | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SZZLU - HCMAU | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SVII - HCMAU | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
| IPOD - HCMAU | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||
LWAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LWAC and LEGT have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LWAC and LEGT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LWAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LWAC | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| LEGT - LWAC | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NHICU - LWAC | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| FACT - LWAC | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PLMIU - LWAC | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HCMAU - LWAC | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||