HCMA
Price
$10.04
Change
-$0.03 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jan 13, 02:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
340.03M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TWLVU
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
203.59M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCMA vs TWLVU

Header iconHCMA vs TWLVU Comparison
Open Charts HCMA vs TWLVUBanner chart's image
Hcm III Acquisition
Price$10.04
Change-$0.03 (-0.30%)
Volume$100
Capitalization340.03M
Twelve Seas Investment Company III
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization203.59M
HCMA vs TWLVU Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCMA vs. TWLVU commentary
Jan 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMA is a Hold and TWLVU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 13, 2026
Stock price -- (HCMA: $10.08 vs. TWLVU: $10.01)
Brand notoriety: HCMA and TWLVU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCMA: 56% vs. TWLVU: 1%
Market capitalization -- HCMA: $340.03M vs. TWLVU: $203.59M
HCMA [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $340.03M. TWLVU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $203.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $181.99M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTWLVU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HCMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TWLVU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCMA is a better buy in the long-term than TWLVU.

Price Growth

HCMA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while TWLVU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +7.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+7.67% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMA($340M) has a higher market cap than TWLVU($204M). TWLVU YTD gains are higher at: 0.603 vs. HCMA (0.398).
HCMATWLVUHCMA / TWLVU
Capitalization340M204M167%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.3980.60366%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash1.15MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GEVX29.631.62
+5.78%
Tradr 2X Long GEV Daily ETF
FEMB29.990.08
+0.27%
First Trust Emerging Mkts Lcl Ccy Bd ETF
USPX60.910.06
+0.10%
Franklin US Equity Index ETF
IBID25.82-0.01
-0.03%
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term Tips ETF
CGHM25.61-0.01
-0.04%
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF

HCMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMA has been loosely correlated with NPWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCMA jumps, then NPWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMA
1D Price
Change %
HCMA100%
N/A
NPWR - HCMA
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
HCMAU - HCMA
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
TWLVU - HCMA
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WELNF - HCMA
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESHA - HCMA
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
More

TWLVU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TWLVU has been loosely correlated with SZZLU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TWLVU jumps, then SZZLU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TWLVU
1D Price
Change %
TWLVU100%
N/A
SZZLU - TWLVU
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SOC - TWLVU
39%
Loosely correlated
+8.66%
HCMA - TWLVU
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FACT - TWLVU
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
AIMUF - TWLVU
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More