Advertisement
HCM vs SFOSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCM is a Buy and SFOSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HCM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFOSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HCM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SFOSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HCM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFOSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HCM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SFOSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
HCM (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -5.58% price change this week, while SFOSF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was -7.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -1.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
HCM is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-1.90% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
| HCM | SFOSF | HCM / SFOSF | |
| Capitalization | 2.54B | 9.45B | 27% |
| EBITDA | 38M | 6.27B | 1% |
| Gain YTD | 7.952 | 6.216 | 128% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.43 | 14.88 | 37% |
| Revenue | 602M | 39.5B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 1.37B | 13.5B | 10% |
| Total Debt | 93.4M | 36.7B | 0% |
HCM | SFOSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 96 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SFOSF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HCM (90) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that SFOSF’s stock grew significantly faster than HCM’s over the last 12 months.
SFOSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HCM (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that SFOSF’s stock grew similarly to HCM’s over the last 12 months.
HCM's SMR Rating (19) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFOSF (79) in the null industry. This means that HCM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFOSF’s over the last 12 months.
SFOSF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as HCM (60) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that SFOSF’s stock grew similarly to HCM’s over the last 12 months.
SFOSF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCM (99) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that SFOSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCM’s over the last 12 months.
| HCM | SFOSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QVOY | 28.40 | 0.33 | +1.18% |
| Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF | |||
| OMFS | 47.83 | 0.18 | +0.38% |
| Invesco Russell 2000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF | |||
| CLOI | 52.85 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| VanEck CLO ETF | |||
| WTPI | 33.48 | -0.25 | -0.74% |
| WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund | |||
| UXAP | 39.35 | -0.39 | -0.98% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Uncppd Acceler ETF - Apr | |||
HCM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HCM and GELS have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCM and GELS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCM | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| GELS - HCM | 30% Poorly correlated | -10.05% | ||
| ACET - HCM | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.51% | ||
| TLRY - HCM | 27% Poorly correlated | +4.57% | ||
| CGC - HCM | 27% Poorly correlated | +7.34% | ||
| BHC - HCM | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
More | ||||
SFOSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SFOSF and CANN have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFOSF and CANN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFOSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFOSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CANN - SFOSF | 21% Poorly correlated | +9.27% | ||
| HCM - SFOSF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.17% | ||
| SGIOF - SFOSF | 11% Poorly correlated | +18.18% | ||
| RAFA - SFOSF | 9% Poorly correlated | +15.01% | ||
| TKPHF - SFOSF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||