HCKG
Price
$21.50
Change
-$0.50 (-2.27%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MTPOY
Price
$27.30
Change
+$0.30 (+1.11%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCKG vs MTPOY

Header iconHCKG vs MTPOY Comparison
Open Charts HCKG vs MTPOYBanner chart's image
Hocking Valley Bancshares, Inc. (OH)
Price$21.50
Change-$0.50 (-2.27%)
Volume$648
CapitalizationN/A
Metropolitan Bank & Trust
Price$27.30
Change+$0.30 (+1.11%)
Volume$200
Capitalization4.8B
HCKG vs MTPOY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HCKG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTPOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCKG vs. MTPOY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCKG is a Hold and MTPOY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HCKG: $21.50 vs. MTPOY: $27.30)
Brand notoriety: HCKG and MTPOY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCKG: 129% vs. MTPOY: 92%
Market capitalization -- HCKG: $0 vs. MTPOY: $4.8B
HCKG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. MTPOY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCKG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTPOY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HCKG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTPOY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTPOY is a better buy in the long-term than HCKG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCKG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTPOY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HCKG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTPOY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTPOY is a better buy in the short-term than HCKG.

Price Growth

HCKG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.60% price change this week, while MTPOY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCKG YTD gains are higher at: 13.370 vs. MTPOY (2.845).
HCKGMTPOYHCKG / MTPOY
CapitalizationN/A4.8B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.3702.845470%
P/E RatioN/A7.91-
RevenueN/A118B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A102B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCKG vs MTPOY: Fundamental Ratings
HCKG
MTPOY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1006
SMR RATING
1..100
641
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5046
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCKG's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOY (36). This means that HCKG’s stock grew similarly to MTPOY’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HCKG (100). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew significantly faster than HCKG’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCKG (64). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCKG’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as HCKG (56). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to HCKG’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as HCKG (50). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to HCKG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCKGMTPOY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
19%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HCKG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTPOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZVRA9.740.33
+3.51%
Zevra Therapeutics
DT56.541.87
+3.42%
Dynatrace
GSIT3.540.10
+2.91%
GSI Technology
CHSN0.13N/A
+1.97%
Chanson International Holding
TMDX129.191.50
+1.17%
TransMedics Group

HCKG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCKG and MTPOY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCKG and MTPOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCKG
1D Price
Change %
HCKG100%
-2.27%
MTPOY - HCKG
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKQNY - HCKG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFBX - HCKG
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
HMLN - HCKG
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HONT - HCKG
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MTPOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTPOY has been loosely correlated with BDGSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTPOY jumps, then BDGSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTPOY
1D Price
Change %
MTPOY100%
N/A
BDGSF - MTPOY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HCKG - MTPOY
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
PBKC - MTPOY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTBP - MTPOY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDCB - MTPOY
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.46%
More