HCHDF
Price
$4.59
Change
+$0.41 (+9.81%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
2.36B
28 days until earnings call
WRLGF
Price
$0.74
Change
-$0.01 (-1.33%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
262.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCHDF vs WRLGF

Header iconHCHDF vs WRLGF Comparison
Open Charts HCHDF vs WRLGFBanner chart's image
Hochschild Mining
Price$4.59
Change+$0.41 (+9.81%)
Volume$28.36K
Capitalization2.36B
WEST RED LAKE GOLD MINES
Price$0.74
Change-$0.01 (-1.33%)
Volume$1.14M
Capitalization262.37M
HCHDF vs WRLGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HCHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCHDF vs. WRLGF commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCHDF is a Hold and WRLGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (HCHDF: $4.59 vs. WRLGF: $0.74)
Brand notoriety: HCHDF and WRLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCHDF: 112% vs. WRLGF: 165%
Market capitalization -- HCHDF: $2.36B vs. WRLGF: $262.37M
HCHDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.36B. WRLGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $262.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCHDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWRLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HCHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WRLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCHDF is a better buy in the long-term than WRLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCHDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRLGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HCHDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WRLGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HCHDF and WRLGF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HCHDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.96% price change this week, while WRLGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +31.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2100.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCHDF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.44% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCHDF($2.36B) has a higher market cap than WRLGF($262M). HCHDF (79.810) and WRLGF (77.238) have similar YTD gains . HCHDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 442M vs. WRLGF (-79.23M). HCHDF has more cash in the bank: 112M vs. WRLGF (23.7M). WRLGF has less debt than HCHDF: WRLGF (97.1M) vs HCHDF (324M). HCHDF has higher revenues than WRLGF: HCHDF (1.08B) vs WRLGF (0).
HCHDFWRLGFHCHDF / WRLGF
Capitalization2.36B262M900%
EBITDA442M-79.23M-558%
Gain YTD79.81077.238103%
P/E Ratio16.22N/A-
Revenue1.08B0-
Total Cash112M23.7M473%
Total Debt324M97.1M334%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCHDF: Fundamental Ratings
HCHDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
85
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCHDFWRLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HCHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWHUX36.340.28
+0.78%
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci Instl Svc
HFETX58.030.35
+0.61%
Janus Henderson European Focus T
WCMWX19.100.05
+0.26%
WCM Focused Emerging Mkts Ex Chn Inst
WOFNX65.990.02
+0.03%
Allspring Opportunity Inst
FZAPX89.62N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel Z

WRLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRLGF has been loosely correlated with KNTNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRLGF jumps, then KNTNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRLGF
1D Price
Change %
WRLGF100%
-0.20%
KNTNF - WRLGF
36%
Loosely correlated
+7.29%
WDOFF - WRLGF
36%
Loosely correlated
+5.60%
TORXF - WRLGF
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.68%
LGDTF - WRLGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.75%
JAGGF - WRLGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.81%
More