HCHDF
Price
$4.59
Change
+$0.41 (+9.81%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
2.36B
28 days until earnings call
LGDTF
Price
$0.45
Change
+$0.02 (+4.65%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
208.07M
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCHDF vs LGDTF

Header iconHCHDF vs LGDTF Comparison
Open Charts HCHDF vs LGDTFBanner chart's image
Hochschild Mining
Price$4.59
Change+$0.41 (+9.81%)
Volume$28.36K
Capitalization2.36B
Liberty Gold
Price$0.45
Change+$0.02 (+4.65%)
Volume$528.96K
Capitalization208.07M
HCHDF vs LGDTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HCHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGDTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCHDF vs. LGDTF commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCHDF is a Hold and LGDTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (HCHDF: $4.59 vs. LGDTF: $0.45)
Brand notoriety: HCHDF and LGDTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCHDF: 112% vs. LGDTF: 88%
Market capitalization -- HCHDF: $2.36B vs. LGDTF: $208.07M
HCHDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.36B. LGDTF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $208.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCHDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLGDTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HCHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LGDTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCHDF is a better buy in the long-term than LGDTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCHDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGDTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HCHDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LGDTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HCHDF is a better buy in the short-term than LGDTF.

Price Growth

HCHDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.96% price change this week, while LGDTF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +31.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2100.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCHDF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

LGDTF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.44% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCHDF($2.36B) has a higher market cap than LGDTF($208M). LGDTF YTD gains are higher at: 146.648 vs. HCHDF (79.810). HCHDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 442M vs. LGDTF (-17.58M). HCHDF has more cash in the bank: 112M vs. LGDTF (17.7M). LGDTF has less debt than HCHDF: LGDTF (290K) vs HCHDF (324M). HCHDF has higher revenues than LGDTF: HCHDF (1.08B) vs LGDTF (0).
HCHDFLGDTFHCHDF / LGDTF
Capitalization2.36B208M1,134%
EBITDA442M-17.58M-2,514%
Gain YTD79.810146.64854%
P/E Ratio16.22N/A-
Revenue1.08B0-
Total Cash112M17.7M633%
Total Debt324M290K111,724%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCHDF vs LGDTF: Fundamental Ratings
HCHDF
LGDTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8582
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50100
SMR RATING
1..100
4398
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4136
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9621
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCHDF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LGDTF (88). This means that HCHDF’s stock grew significantly faster than LGDTF’s over the last 12 months.

HCHDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGDTF (100). This means that HCHDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGDTF’s over the last 12 months.

HCHDF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGDTF (98). This means that HCHDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGDTF’s over the last 12 months.

LGDTF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as HCHDF (41). This means that LGDTF’s stock grew similarly to HCHDF’s over the last 12 months.

LGDTF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HCHDF (96). This means that LGDTF’s stock grew significantly faster than HCHDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCHDFLGDTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HCHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGDTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAAGX20.950.10
+0.48%
Thrivent Large Cap Growth A
FWCBX78.830.03
+0.04%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr 529F3
VYCIX27.42N/A
N/A
Voya Corporate Leaders 100 W
BUIBX21.45-0.04
-0.19%
Buffalo Flexible Allocation Inst
LMRIX30.74-0.09
-0.29%
1919 Financial Services I

LGDTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGDTF has been loosely correlated with LUGDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGDTF jumps, then LUGDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGDTF
1D Price
Change %
LGDTF100%
+4.75%
LUGDF - LGDTF
51%
Loosely correlated
+4.37%
TORXF - LGDTF
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.68%
KNTNF - LGDTF
51%
Loosely correlated
+7.29%
WDOFF - LGDTF
50%
Loosely correlated
+5.60%
DPMLF - LGDTF
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
More