HCGI
Price
$6.12
Change
+$0.02 (+0.33%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
26.31M
IVSXF
Price
$30.48
Change
+$0.06 (+0.20%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
92.46B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCGI vs IVSXF

Header iconHCGI vs IVSXF Comparison
Open Charts HCGI vs IVSXFBanner chart's image
Huntwicke Capital Group
Price$6.12
Change+$0.02 (+0.33%)
Volume$200
Capitalization26.31M
Investors AB
Price$30.48
Change+$0.06 (+0.20%)
Volume$109
Capitalization92.46B
HCGI vs IVSXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HCGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVSXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCGI vs. IVSXF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCGI is a Hold and IVSXF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HCGI: $6.12 vs. IVSXF: $30.48)
Brand notoriety: HCGI and IVSXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCGI: 52% vs. IVSXF: 17%
Market capitalization -- HCGI: $26.31M vs. IVSXF: $92.46B
HCGI [@Investment Managers] is valued at $26.31M. IVSXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $92.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCGI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIVSXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HCGI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IVSXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IVSXF is a better buy in the long-term than HCGI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCGI’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVSXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HCGI’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • IVSXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IVSXF is a better buy in the short-term than HCGI.

Price Growth

HCGI (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.33% price change this week, while IVSXF (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVSXF($92.5B) has a higher market cap than HCGI($26.3M). HCGI has higher P/E ratio than IVSXF: HCGI (42.28) vs IVSXF (37.57). IVSXF YTD gains are higher at: 15.258 vs. HCGI (5.882). HCGI has less debt than IVSXF: HCGI (1.47M) vs IVSXF (110B).
HCGIIVSXFHCGI / IVSXF
Capitalization26.3M92.5B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.88215.25839%
P/E Ratio42.2837.57113%
RevenueN/A79.9B-
Total Cash946KN/A-
Total Debt1.47M110B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCGI vs IVSXF: Fundamental Ratings
HCGI
IVSXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4128
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
1798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5557
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1002
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IVSXF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HCGI (96). This means that IVSXF’s stock grew significantly faster than HCGI’s over the last 12 months.

IVSXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as HCGI (100). This means that IVSXF’s stock grew similarly to HCGI’s over the last 12 months.

HCGI's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IVSXF (98). This means that HCGI’s stock grew significantly faster than IVSXF’s over the last 12 months.

HCGI's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as IVSXF (57). This means that HCGI’s stock grew similarly to IVSXF’s over the last 12 months.

IVSXF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HCGI (100). This means that IVSXF’s stock grew significantly faster than HCGI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCGIIVSXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HCGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVSXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZIZTF3.15N/A
N/A
Zip Co Ltd.
ALFVF46.50N/A
N/A
Alfa-Laval AB
SEMUF30.00N/A
N/A
Siem Industries, Inc.
ARHLF0.10N/A
N/A
ARCHTIS LTD.
CYCL0.07N/A
N/A
Cycclone Inc.

HCGI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCGI and BCBNF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCGI and BCBNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCGI
1D Price
Change %
HCGI100%
N/A
BCBNF - HCGI
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
MGLLF - HCGI
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVSXF - HCGI
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRRPF - HCGI
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBLBY - HCGI
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IVSXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IVSXF and ICGUF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IVSXF and ICGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVSXF
1D Price
Change %
IVSXF100%
N/A
ICGUF - IVSXF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JBARF - IVSXF
9%
Poorly correlated
-3.67%
IVSBF - IVSXF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCGI - IVSXF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPZYF - IVSXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More